What Happens When Landlords Do Not Set Clear Boundaries With Tenants

Rental disputes in Singapore are not uncommon, but a recent Small Claims Tribunal case involving two nurses and their HDB landlord has highlighted how unclear tenancy terms can spiral into conflict. Beyond the financial penalty imposed, the case underscores the importance of communication and professionalism in landlord-tenant relationships.

Summary Of The Case

Two Malaysian nurses rented separate rooms in the same five-room HDB flat. Their tenancy agreement allowed them to use the air conditioner for up to 8 hours daily. This is a departure from typical room tenancy agreements in Singapore, which confine air-conditioner use only to evenings. This was negotiated by the tenants who worked night shifts and therefore had to use the air-con during the day. However, because of their differing work schedules, the condenser occasionally ran for up to 16 hours.

The landlord’s daughter, who lived in the flat with her husband, objected to the compressor’s extended use because she paid the flat’s utility bills. Tensions escalated when she harassed the tenants, switched off the air-con during their rest, and demanded higher rent or restricted usage.

What made the situation worse was that the daughter also claimed that the nurses’ boyfriends visited and spent time in the rooms, allegedly without identifying themselves to the landlord or obtaining prior authorisation. Eventually, the daughter gave the two tenants an ultimatum, and they vacated the flat by the end of that month.

However, the landlord withheld each of their $800 security deposits, citing excessive electricity use, issues with visitors, and early termination of lease. This is when they filed their respective claims in the Small Claims Tribunal, hoping to recover their deposits.

While the landlord’s entitlement to retain any part of the security deposit is determined entirely by the terms of their lease, the magistrate indicated that “what constituted a necessary deduction… was not a matter to be determined based on the whims and fancies of the landlord”. The magistrate essentially determined that the three reasons the landlord raised were not “valid justification” for withholding the security deposit.

The tribunal ultimately ruled in favour of the tenant, ordering the landlord to pay $1,536.47 to the claimant. This included the original $800 claim, an additional $501.29 for costs incurred (due to the landlord’s absence during hearings), and $235.18 for disbursements incurred in prosecuting the claim. The magistrate noted that none of the landlord’s reasons justified forfeiture and criticised her repeated absence from hearings, which reflected poorly on her credibility.

Read Also: Buy Or Rent A Private Property In 2026: Which Makes More Financial Sense?

Why This Matters For Landlords

For landlords, the case is yet another reminder that rental agreements are legally binding contracts. Attempting to retroactively change terms or enforce unwritten rules can backfire. In Singapore’s competitive rental market, tenants are increasingly discerning, and disputes can affect future rental prospects.

This case also highlights the unique challenges of renting to professionals with demanding schedules, such as nurses or shift workers. Their lifestyle needs may differ from the landlord’s expectations, making upfront clarity even more critical.

Read Also: What Landlords Need To Know Before Renting Out Their HDB Flat or Bedroom In Singapore

Some Ways Landlords Can Avoid Disputes

#1 Set Clear Expectations Before Renting

Draft comprehensive agreements that spell out utility usage, visitor policies, and household rules clearly. For example, if air-con usage is capped, specify whether the limit applies per tenant or per household.

Landlords also need to consider tenants who work night shifts or irregular hours. Their usage patterns may differ from typical households, and agreements should reflect this.

Finally, be transparent about shared spaces. If other family members live in the flat, clarify how common areas will be used and what boundaries exist.

#2 Honour the Contract During Tenancy

Once signed, landlords must respect the contract. Attempting to impose new conditions mid-tenancy undermines trust and risks legal consequences.

If there are concerns, they should be communicated professionally. Raise them through calm discussion or mediation, not unilateral actions like cutting off utilities like in this particular case. Tenants rely on stable living conditions to manage demanding work schedules.

Ultimately, if disputes arise, keep written records of communications. This protects both parties and provides evidence if matters escalate.

#3 Stay Professional When Handling Disputes

Security deposits are meant for damages or unpaid rent. Courts are unlikely to enforce forfeiture for issues such as higher utility bills unless explicitly covered in the agreement.

In this case, the landlord’s repeated absence or dismissive conduct weakened their case and credibility in the eyes of the magistrate. Landlords should take such tribunal hearings seriously as they are formal processes.

Implications For Tenants

While the case primarily highlights landlord responsibilities, tenants also benefit from understanding their rights. Tenancy agreements should be read carefully, and any unclear terms should be clarified before signing. Tenants should also document harassment or breaches of contract, as these records strengthen their case if disputes escalate.

Landlord-tenant relationships are partnerships built on trust. By setting clear expectations upfront and maintaining respectful communication, landlords can avoid disputes that not only cost money but also damage reputations.

In Singapore, where rental demand remains strong, a reputation for fairness and reliability is a valuable asset. This case serves as a timely reminder that professionalism and transparency are the foundation of successful tenancy management.

Read Also: 3 Rental Property Expenses You Can Claim Against Your Rental Income